Skip to content
IGCSE Physics, Cambridge 0625, Malaysia

How to Answer 'Explain' Questions in IGCSE Physics

A step-by-step method for structuring physics explanations using cause-and-effect chains that earn each available mark.

Written by IGCSEPhysics Content Team · Physics subject adviser: K. S. Tan, 15+ years teaching IGCSE Physics · Checked against the Cambridge IGCSE Physics (0625) 2026 to 2028 syllabus

Use this guide to build explanations that follow a logical chain and earn marks in Cambridge IGCSE Physics 0625 exams.

What the examiner expects

‘Explain’ means give reasons. The mark scheme awards marks for a chain of cause and effect, not for restating the observation.

The cause-effect-consequence structure

For any ‘Explain’ question, build a chain:

  1. Cause: What starts the process? (e.g. “temperature increases”)
  2. Effect: What physics happens as a result? (e.g. “particles move faster, so collisions with walls are harder and more frequent”)
  3. Consequence: What is the observable outcome? (e.g. “pressure increases”)

Each link in the chain is typically worth one mark.

Worked example: “Explain why a gas exerts more pressure when heated at constant volume.” [3 marks]

  1. Heating increases the average kinetic energy of the gas particles. [cause]
  2. Particles move faster, hitting the container walls harder and more frequently. [effect]
  3. The total force on the walls increases, so the pressure increases (since volume and area are constant). [consequence]

Worked example: “Explain why metals are good conductors of thermal energy.” [2 marks]

  1. Metals contain free (delocalised) electrons.
  2. These electrons can move through the lattice and transfer kinetic energy rapidly from the hot end to the cold end.

Common errors and how to correct them

  1. Restating the question. “It conducts because it is a good conductor” earns zero. You must explain WHY.

  2. Missing the physics link. Going straight from cause to consequence without the mechanism. “Temperature increases so pressure increases” skips the particle explanation.

  3. Vague language. “The molecules move around more” is less precise than “particles have greater average kinetic energy and collide with the walls harder and more frequently.”

How to apply this in an exam

Count the marks. Write one clear point per mark. Use precise physics language (name the quantity, the mechanism, the principle). Check that each point logically follows from the previous one.

Frequently Asked Questions

How detailed should an explanation be?
Match the detail to the number of marks. A 2-mark question needs two linked physics points. A 4-mark question needs a chain of reasoning with four distinct steps.
Should I use bullet points or full sentences?
Either is acceptable. Bullet points can be clearer and reduce the risk of burying a key point inside a long paragraph. Full sentences work well when the reasoning flows naturally.
What if I know the answer but struggle to explain it?
Use the cause-effect-consequence structure. State what happens first (cause), what physics principle links it (effect), and what the outcome is (consequence). Writing the chain step by step often reveals the explanation.

Next useful steps

Need Help Applying This?

A 0625 specialist can work through the student's current paper or question and help identify whether the main difficulty is content, mathematics, practical reasoning or exam technique.