Skip to content
IGCSE Physics, Cambridge 0625, Malaysia
Core

Comparing Energy Resources

Compare renewable and non-renewable energy resources using criteria such as reliability, environmental impact, cost and power output.

Written by IGCSEPhysics Content Team · Physics subject adviser: K. S. Tan, 15+ years teaching IGCSE Physics · Checked against the Cambridge IGCSE Physics (0625) 2026 to 2028 syllabus

The IGCSE Physics syllabus requires you to compare energy resources using a range of criteria. No single resource is best in every category; the choice depends on local conditions and priorities.

Comparison criteria

CriterionWhat to consider
ReliabilityCan it provide power on demand, or is it intermittent?
Environmental impactGreenhouse gases, pollution, land use, habitat disruption
Running costFuel costs, maintenance, staffing
Initial costConstruction of the power station or installation
Power outputHow much electricity can it generate?
Location requirementsDoes it need wind, sunlight, water, or a specific geography?
Fuel supplyIs the fuel finite or replenished?

Summary comparison

ResourceReliable?CO2 during operationPower outputFuel cost
CoalYesHighHighModerate
Natural gasYesModerateHighModerate
NuclearYesNoneVery highLow
SolarNo (intermittent)NoneLow per unitNone
WindNo (intermittent)NoneLow per unitNone
HydroelectricYes (if reservoir)NoneHighNone
GeothermalYesVery lowModerateNone

The role of energy mix

Most countries use a combination of resources (an energy mix) to balance reliability, cost and environmental impact. Renewable resources reduce carbon emissions but require backup from reliable sources when output is low.

Worked example

Explain why a country might choose to build both a gas-fired power station and a wind farm.

The gas-fired station provides reliable base-load power that is not affected by weather. The wind farm reduces the amount of fossil fuel burned and lowers overall carbon emissions. Together, they balance reliability with environmental responsibility.

Common errors and how to correct them

Stating that one resource is “the best” without qualification. Every resource has trade-offs. Always justify the comparison with specific criteria.

Using vague language like “bad for the environment” without explaining how. State the specific impact: carbon dioxide emissions cause climate change; sulfur dioxide causes acid rain; radioactive waste requires secure long-term storage.

How to apply this in an exam

Structure comparison answers by criterion. Use a table if space allows. Give specific advantages and disadvantages for each resource mentioned, not generic statements.

Need help with this concept?

A 0625 specialist can work through the student's current question and help identify whether the difficulty is the concept, the calculation or the exam technique.